Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 53(7): 102786, 2024 Apr 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599518

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: 24 % of abortion in Italy are repeated procedure. The cause of repeated abortion can be traced back to the inadequacy of the contraceptive counseling during the previous admission or to the adoption of an ineffective contraception method. This study aims to evaluate the Italian situation on the perceived quality of contraceptive counselling by patients undergoing abortion. The second aim is to verify if the chosen methods were available for immediate start. STUDY DESIGN: Multicentric, prospective, non-interventional, non-randomized, non-pharmacological clinical observational study. We analyzed anonymous questionnaires on contraceptive counseling and LARC (Long Acting Reversable Contraceptives) availability and SARC (Short Acting Reversable Contraceptives) prescription at hospital discharge, distributed to women who requested abortion. RESULTS: 1074 participants on 15 hospitals through Italy. 82 % of the interviewees reported that they had received correct information regarding contraception. 74 % of the patients who chose LARC methods reported to have them inserted at the time of abortion. 73 % of women who had chosen a SARC method stated that they had received the prescription before discharge. After contraceptive counselling, we reported a significative reduction of "none or natural methods use" and a significant increase of SARC and LARC use compared to before the abortion. CONCLUSION: Contraceptive counselling could allow a better contraceptive choice in patient who required abortion and we hope that future strategies will implement LARC choice. We think that a greater availability of LARC at an affordable price at the time of abortion could improve LARC choice. In case of SARC choice, we have to implement the prescription at hospital discharged.

2.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 24(4): 640-645, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28232037

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe safety, tolerability, and effectiveness results through a minimum 2-year follow-up of patients who underwent permanent sterilization with the Essure insert. DESIGN: A retrospective multicenter study (Canadian Task Force classification II2). SETTING: Seven general hospitals and 4 clinical teaching centers in Italy. PATIENTS: A total of 1968 women, mean age 39.5 years (range, 23-48 years) who underwent office hysteroscopic sterilization using the Essure insert between April 1, 2003, and December 30, 2014. INTERVENTION: The women underwent office hysteroscopic bilateral Essure insert placement, with satisfactory device location and tube occlusion based on hysterosalpingography or hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Placement rate, successful bilateral tubal occlusion, perioperative adverse events, early postoperative (during the first 3 months of follow-up), and late complications were evaluated. Satisfactory insertion was accomplished in 97.2% of women and, in 4, perforation and 1 expulsion were detected during hysterosalpingography. Three unintended pregnancies occurred before the 3-month confirmation test. Two pregnancies were reported among women relying on the Essure inserts. Postprocedure pain was minimal and brief; in 9 women, pelvic pain became intractable, necessitating removal of the devices via laparoscopy. On telephone interviews, overall satisfaction was rated as "very satisfied" by the majority of women (97.6%), and no long-term adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: The findings from this extended Italian survey further support the effectiveness, tolerability, and satisfaction of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization when motivated women are selected and well informed of the potential risks of the device. Moreover, the results do not demonstrate an increased incidence of complications and pregnancies associated with long-term Essure use. Patients with a known hypersensitivity to nickel may be less suitable candidates for the Essure insert.


Assuntos
Esterilização Reprodutiva , Esterilização Tubária/métodos , Adulto , Tubas Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade , Histerossalpingografia , Histeroscopia , Itália , Laparoscopia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Níquel/efeitos adversos , Dor/etiologia , Gravidez , Gravidez não Planejada , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esterilização Reprodutiva/efeitos adversos , Esterilização Reprodutiva/instrumentação , Esterilização Reprodutiva/métodos , Esterilização Tubária/efeitos adversos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA